It rarely fails to happen:
1. I go to a con.
2. I feel good for having gone to the con and having had a good time.
3. I read the con reports, see myself totally absent, and get really depressed.
This continuously amazes me, given that I've done some things over the years I thought were highly conspicuous. I once coordinated the smuggling of a sousaphone into OVFF. I have run cons. I have done concerts complete with costume changes and choreography. I've tried to make a sanitary napkin with wings fly while on stage. I've brought an insufferably cute dog to cons.
This time even the dog didn't get mentioned.
1. I go to a con.
2. I feel good for having gone to the con and having had a good time.
3. I read the con reports, see myself totally absent, and get really depressed.
This continuously amazes me, given that I've done some things over the years I thought were highly conspicuous. I once coordinated the smuggling of a sousaphone into OVFF. I have run cons. I have done concerts complete with costume changes and choreography. I've tried to make a sanitary napkin with wings fly while on stage. I've brought an insufferably cute dog to cons.
This time even the dog didn't get mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 11:29 pm (UTC)I'm assuming the answer is yes. In which case - isn't that what matters? Why does it matter about conreports? Unless you go to cons to be seen & written about...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 11:39 pm (UTC)All the same, I hear what you are saying. Everyone needs their ego stroked once in a while. So, we met, it was cool, and Lady is a cutey, and I'm sorry I didn't say so in my own LJ space. I meant to. But yeah, I know all about the road to hell and good intentions and all of that. Forgive? -H...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 12:24 am (UTC)*hugs*
I look very much forward to meet you at 16 tones, and if I get to write a conreport, I promise to mention you ;-) . Will you mention me ,too?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:02 pm (UTC)Suffice it to say I've got a couple of things up my sleeve I'm waiting to see your reaction on.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 02:34 am (UTC)(Part of the reason being that if I write it for LJ then I need to edit things like names to be pointers to LJs and that sort of stuff, which is a real pain...)
(I still think that you're cuter than Lady, who is very cute. But then I'm prejudiced in favour of my own species <g>...)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 03:11 am (UTC)I have been in situations where I did need to be careful with others' perceptions, career-wise, and it's still not a productive activity. That's a frustrating thing when it's money and your future on the line, and that's enough frustration for a lifetime. For filk, which is our pleasure and recreation, it's not worth a damn.
As far as I'm concerned, you're one of the all-too-many people I didn't get to spend enough time with at GaFilk. That's both a bit of frustration for me and a sign of how many decent people there are in filking.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:04 pm (UTC)I filk to filk. Someone once asked me if I got into filk to be famous. I replied, "I already am famous. I'm on the radio. I get fan mail. I filk because I need to."
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 03:18 pm (UTC)Heh. That's a quote I want to file. =:o}
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 04:21 am (UTC)One day I'll finish my conrep for my visit to Consonance. So far I haven't even got to the convention!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 05:54 am (UTC)Enjoy the con for the experience of the con, and leave it at that. Sherman is so right when he says "that way lies madness."
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:12 pm (UTC)I care most about how I felt about the con. If twenty gazillion people wrote scathing reports about a con and I had a good time at it, do you think I'd care about their opinions (other than feeling bad that they had a bad time)? On the other hand, if others enjoyed a con and I didn't, I feel cheated.
This didn't happen with either of the GAFilks I've attended, but there was a con where I had a miserable time, said so in my journal, and instead of concom members trying to make it better, they started attacking me. I no longer write conreps about that con if I go because the only reason I go to it any more is to see others who are there.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 03:45 pm (UTC)Regarding the "con where I had a miserable time, [and] said so":
Hmmm... This may not be pertinent to your case (I don't know at what stage your offered your critique), but as a generality: There's an important phenomenon to bear in mind here. The natural time for people to want to comment on how good or bad a con was (or indeed to offer small criticisms whilst applauding the overall whole) is immediately after the 'con. Unfortunately (as I'm sure you know first hand! =:o} ) this is precisely the time when the concom are poorest equipped to take any criticisms calmly or objectively. They're exhausted! They may have thoroughly enjoyed the 'con, or they may have been through hell, but either way their experience will have been very different to the experience of the general congoers, because it was the final frantic burst of energy at the end of a long run of hard slog, and right now all they want to do is sleep... Except that, like you, they can't resist reading the conreps!
And, of course, its their *baby* you're talking about. No mother* takes kindly to criticism of her baby. (What's the average gestation period for filk con... About 18 months? =:o} )
*(Well, almost no mother... )
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 05:21 pm (UTC)With that in mind, if someone has constructive criticism ("You suck" is not constructive; "You suck because..." is), I like it.
One of the nice things about the Consonance concom is we are pretty blunt with each other with the understanding that we do it because we care. If someone tells me something's off, I accept it. I figure I must be doing something right because people keep coming back to work on the concom. The attrition we've had is due to people moving out of the area due to the sucky economy.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 06:47 am (UTC)A conrep is, at best, fragmentary.
And hey, it could be worse. People could mention you in a nasty context ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 07:08 am (UTC)I've also gone to parties, and spoken with the host for like a half hour. Afterwards I was told by the same host that I "should have attended" the party, that I should get out more.
I am invisible and unrememberable.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 07:46 am (UTC)As for running cons, or filking at cons, the people who do all the work don't usually get a mention unless something goes drastically wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 09:38 am (UTC)It was a pleasure to sit by you and hear you Friday night. I remember your 2x10 Saturday, but not what you sang. Refresh my memory and I should be able to give you better feedback. It was good to talk for a few minutes going into the banquet. GAFilk this year was so large that I didn't do more than nod to the majority of people attending. I'm sorry that we didn't end up in the same open filk space; I would like to hear more of your work.
Blessings and joy.
Robert
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 01:52 pm (UTC)I enjoyed your performance. Thank you for reminding me of the specifics. Now, I'll post the information to my own LJ, so I won't loose it again.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 07:22 pm (UTC)Still, I understand how you feel. I'm getting zero recognition locally for all the work (and expense) I put in bidding for what eventually became the 2004 Westercon here in Phoenix.
Because there will be kick-ass filk, I'll be there, but I am very reluctant to go at all. I'd rather be in Victoria or Seattle that weekend.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-19 09:13 pm (UTC)If it's typical of the reputation Phoenix area cons have, I'm expecting the weather to be exceedingly hot bordering on unpleasant (hey, I'm part Egyptian; I can take heat :-) ), the bulk of the con to suck doody, and the filk track to kick major butt.
I also know extremely well how much a part you had in that bid, dammit. I've been involved in the bid side of Westercons and Worldcons for around 20 years now.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 08:47 pm (UTC)I've already committed to being in a (non-filk)performance and maybe some panels.
And I'm actually enjoying the fact that I'm not running the thing. My Raving Ego loves its attention, but it's nice to not be In Charge. Especially in Phoenix in July.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 10:45 am (UTC)*hugs*
Posting this is a bit Heisenbergian: I don't want this post to influence anyone's behavior or choices in their conreports. What's done is done. I also don't want to seem whiny. In general I don't care that much whether I'm mentioned or not, and I wouldn't want anyone to make a decision about his/her conreport based on consideration of my (or anyone's) feelings.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 12:33 pm (UTC)Shadow of Insecurity?
Date: 2004-01-20 07:59 pm (UTC)Sometimes I feel like I'm a filk wallflower because I'm not a performer, up on the stage, playing and performing -- I've spent a lot of time in the audience recently. I find it difficult to jump in during filk circles, since I'm so afraid I'd interrupt someone and get chewed out for it, or someone will interrupt me. Either that or I'm horrendous at reading other people's cues. (I'd probably do better in a non-chaos filk, where the rotation passes in a strict order.)
I call this feeling my "Shadow of Insecurity" -- Shadow because it's a part of me I hide and deny. (I think that term comes from Jungian psychology.) It craves attention, approval, acceptance, and love, because when I'm feeling ignored, I don't feel important, and when I'm in the limelight, I feel important.
Egoboo is like gravy -- it's great when you can get it, but I wouldn't want to become dependant on it or gorge on it.
Re: Shadow of Insecurity?
Date: 2004-01-20 09:27 pm (UTC)