In California one of the things we'll be voting on is Proposition 8. If passed, it would add the following wording to the California State Constitution:
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
An identical proposition passed in 2000 but was ruled "unconstitutional" by the CA State Supreme Court because it discriminates against a segment of the population.
If it passes again, the court is likely to make the same ruling, just as the US Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled anti-flag-burning legislation as "unconstitutional."
I don't know what percentage of the California population is gay, but nonetheless, such a law would only legalize active discrimination, just as the "separate but equal" laws did years ago. What I don't understand is why the supporters of this proposition are so adamant to try to legislate discrimination which, if passed, will be overturned yet again.
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
An identical proposition passed in 2000 but was ruled "unconstitutional" by the CA State Supreme Court because it discriminates against a segment of the population.
If it passes again, the court is likely to make the same ruling, just as the US Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled anti-flag-burning legislation as "unconstitutional."
I don't know what percentage of the California population is gay, but nonetheless, such a law would only legalize active discrimination, just as the "separate but equal" laws did years ago. What I don't understand is why the supporters of this proposition are so adamant to try to legislate discrimination which, if passed, will be overturned yet again.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-24 02:24 am (UTC)Dislike (dare I say fear?) of the stranger or alien is the basis of this kind of campaign. Hoping these feelings are amenable to reason is like hoping the Nazis would be satisfied with the German borders established by Versailles, or like hoping businesses will accept a reduction in profits when they can use money to bend and abridge the laws to their sole benefit.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-24 06:57 am (UTC)Trust me, it's biological.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-24 08:54 am (UTC)All I got was this lousy t-shirt.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-24 11:18 am (UTC)Seriously, I have a greater chance of being harmed by a plate of spaghetti than by a homosexual couple.