An interesting problem
Nov. 17th, 2004 11:55 pmIt's interesting from a scientific point, anyway.
From my POV, it means I really have to get cracking on finishing up those vocal harmony arrangements for my CD.
The reason? My alto is going to become a baritone soon.
Specifically, Dr. Jane Ann Robinson told me today she plans to become Dr. James Daniel Robinson.
We joked that if things take a while, she could cut all the alto tracks, then after her voice changes, she could cut baritone tracks. (Actually, she thinks she'll be a tenor like her father, but I think she'll be a baritone.)
From my POV, it means I really have to get cracking on finishing up those vocal harmony arrangements for my CD.
The reason? My alto is going to become a baritone soon.
Specifically, Dr. Jane Ann Robinson told me today she plans to become Dr. James Daniel Robinson.
We joked that if things take a while, she could cut all the alto tracks, then after her voice changes, she could cut baritone tracks. (Actually, she thinks she'll be a tenor like her father, but I think she'll be a baritone.)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:12 am (UTC)Just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:27 am (UTC)Did Jane/James say this was public information?
Though it does give us an interesting talking point for our appointments on Sunday.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:20 pm (UTC)I told Jane I'd let her spread it, and she replied, "You have my official permission to tell other folks."
"Are you sure?" I replied.
"Yes," she answered. "You're the one person I can trust to disseminate gossip and get it right without embellishing it."
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:52 pm (UTC)So will be the more formal James or just Jim.
Dr James
v
Dr Jim
Dr James has a nice ring, but echos Dr Jane.
Dr Jim seems a bit clipped off for me.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:57 pm (UTC)...which is actually one of the things I think "Dr. James" has in its favor...makes the transition easier for people zie encounters professionally (frex), who might not have any experience dealing with transfolk.
[I was realizing last night that I actually know more FTMs than MTFs...which feels weird, since AFAIK they're the minority of transfolk. Must ask
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:33 pm (UTC)I prefer "Dr. J.," "J.D.," or "J.R."
As to which she'll go by as a he, I'd ask Sunday.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-22 08:36 am (UTC)She has excluded a few variants already. Such as Jimmy.
Oh, as you can tell my use of the pronoun "she", she has not made the switch yet. Though she is amused that her friends are more concerned about being PC and/or wanting exact timings.
Though she has added James Robinson as DBA/AKA to her bank accounts.
James Robinson....
Date: 2005-03-17 05:55 pm (UTC)Went from a she to he...
(Rats. I'm stuck on adapting the next two lines. For those who don't recognize it, the reference is to "James James Morrison Morrison Weatherby George Duprey" or however it's spelled, which I think is by A. A. Milne.)
There have been at least two other musicians named James Robinson, so I'd guess he'll be sticking with Dr. James for now as a performing monicker...?
Forgot to sign
Date: 2005-03-17 06:15 pm (UTC)Someone once described this as "remedial puberty", for those who weren't quite satisfied with their instructor the first time around...
I'm less bemused by people changing bodies than by the fact that someone asked ME for advice on what to say to job interviewers when references/transcripts use the old name. Best I could come up with is "Just treat it as a paperwork issue, like any other name change. For a large corporation which tracks minority hiring percentage this might actually be a slight plus. If you feel a need to bring it up, the best time to do so might be when they get to discussion of health/family benefits." I'm not convinced that's the best possible approach, but it's the best I could come up with.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-19 02:50 am (UTC)And *hugs* to both of you while you're at it. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-19 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 12:51 pm (UTC)Maybe you should start looking for that frequency shifter now.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:22 pm (UTC)What I actually need to be more concerned with is the "between" period. Hormone injections in a FTM transsexual cause the voice to go through puberty -- complete with cracking.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 03:07 pm (UTC)So does this mean that voice pitch is primarily hormonal? I always assumed there were some physical difference in the larynx or vocal cords that affected this.
I like the idea of having some tracks from Jane and some from James, though, if the recording schedule permits. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:53 pm (UTC)I was a mezzo-soprano; now I'm a baritone. That seems to bear out her theory.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-22 08:40 am (UTC)Which is when the physical changes really start to show.
Which is when all the "hormonal" urges kick in a well.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 02:51 am (UTC)Knowing some of her prefernces, JoeS and I have already given her some interesting web sites to go to.
We actually got her to blush of the concept of her (then him) surfing for porn.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:32 pm (UTC)Out of curiosity....
Date: 2004-11-18 09:03 pm (UTC)Re: Out of curiosity....
Date: 2004-11-18 09:34 pm (UTC)(That was my first question, btw. Great minds think alike.)
Re: Out of curiosity....
Date: 2004-11-18 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 02:51 pm (UTC)Hmmm... "trannies" isn't offensive, is it? If it is, then I apologize, and what word is preferable?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-27 03:37 pm (UTC)I think it's like a lot of other epithets -- it depends on the context and the experiences of the listener. I've met a couple of people, usually older transgendered people, who absolutely will not suffer the term in their presence. The term is often used in pornography, so it has connotations of dehumanization and fetishization. But on the other hand, the younger trans crowd seems perfectly comfortable using it in group names, event flyers, and so forth. Unfortunately, there's also a degree of political correctness around it, in that trans people are more likely to get away with it...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-07 08:01 pm (UTC)Though I hadn't thought about it before, this exchange would be appropriate for the mailing list of the American Dialect Society. Do you mind if I post it there? Of course, I can include your posting name or not, as you prefer.
-- Dr. Whom, Consulting Linguist, Grammarian,
Orthoepist, and Philological Busybody
[This text prepared with Dragon NaturallySpeaking.]
no subject
Date: 2005-04-07 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 08:07 pm (UTC)-- Dr. Whom, Consulting Linguist, Grammarian,
Orthoepist, and Philological Busybody
a.k.a. Mark A. Mandel
[This text prepared with Dragon NaturallySpeaking.]
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 08:10 pm (UTC)-- Dr. Whom, Consulting Linguist, Grammarian,
Orthoepist, and Philological Busybody
a.k.a. Mark A. Mandel
[THIS text prepared with Dragon NaturallySpeaking.]