But are they really married?
From the Friday, February 13th edition of the San Jose Mercury News:
State officials responsible for recording nuptials said Friday [February 13th] that they will accept only standard license forms, which use "an unmarried man" and "an unmarried woman."
If a form is altered or not completed correctly, "It would be returned to the county," said Terri Delgadillo, a deputy health secretary. "We would not record it at the state level."
State officials responsible for recording nuptials said Friday [February 13th] that they will accept only standard license forms, which use "an unmarried man" and "an unmarried woman."
If a form is altered or not completed correctly, "It would be returned to the county," said Terri Delgadillo, a deputy health secretary. "We would not record it at the state level."
no subject
DebbieB
formerly of The Duras Sisters
languishing in the Wilds of Kentucky
no subject
no subject
(Just because something was supported by some "majority of voters somewhere" does not make it right or ethical - many people wanted to keep the vote from blacks and women, and prevent "different races" from marrying.... but part of the job of laws is to PROTECT MINORITIES from being stomped on by the "majority".)
Go Gavin Newsom!! XD
Marriage Licenses
Of course, my own belief is that the government should get out of the marriage business, but then, that's me.
Re: Marriage Licenses
Lockyer has come out saying he's against the state law that makes marriage "one man, one woman," but would uphold the law as it exists. IMHO Arnold's "order" gave Lockyer the excuse he'd wanted to drag his heels. Hee. I want the popcorn concession.