Warren's latest NS appointment
May. 8th, 2003 10:15 amWarren got turned down for surgery again yesterday.
This time the surgeon was really flip with him and stormed out on us like a five-year-old throwing a temper tantrum. The surgeon gave us all this hooey about how he "didn't see any hemmorrhaging" in the MRI (you can't see hemmorrhaging on an MRI unless it's severe) and told Warren "there's no pressure on [his] brain."
We tried asking questions, and that's when the guy exclaimed, "I don't have to give you a reason!" and started storming out. He didn't just walk out; his tone of voice sounded like a kid who insisted on having his own way. I asked what he did recommend as treatment given that the neurologist said he can't be treated with drugs. "I don't know, and I don't care."
I tried pointing out that Warren can't work. "Well that's not my problem!" he exclaimed.
"Then would you support a disability claim?"
"Absolutely not!"
Warren then tried to change the subject by asking him what a programmable shunt was. "It's a shunt where you can change the amount of fluid drained off, but that's irrelevant, because I'm not going to put a foreign tube in your head that drains fluid down to your stomach!"
Then he rushed out; all Warren could get in was "Bye, Doc!" behind him.
Warren wanted to know the dimensions of the cyst according to the new MRIs, but this guy wasn't even looking at the film.
Something is very fishy. We overheard him and another NS talking before the appointment (the NS was 15 minutes late), saying, "Something's wrong here." We couldn't hear further, but we had the feeling someone is ordering these guys to not operate. When the word "conspiracy" keeps coming up, and it's the doctors who keep using it (as in "There' s no conspiracy against you"), it makes you wonder.
This time the surgeon was really flip with him and stormed out on us like a five-year-old throwing a temper tantrum. The surgeon gave us all this hooey about how he "didn't see any hemmorrhaging" in the MRI (you can't see hemmorrhaging on an MRI unless it's severe) and told Warren "there's no pressure on [his] brain."
We tried asking questions, and that's when the guy exclaimed, "I don't have to give you a reason!" and started storming out. He didn't just walk out; his tone of voice sounded like a kid who insisted on having his own way. I asked what he did recommend as treatment given that the neurologist said he can't be treated with drugs. "I don't know, and I don't care."
I tried pointing out that Warren can't work. "Well that's not my problem!" he exclaimed.
"Then would you support a disability claim?"
"Absolutely not!"
Warren then tried to change the subject by asking him what a programmable shunt was. "It's a shunt where you can change the amount of fluid drained off, but that's irrelevant, because I'm not going to put a foreign tube in your head that drains fluid down to your stomach!"
Then he rushed out; all Warren could get in was "Bye, Doc!" behind him.
Warren wanted to know the dimensions of the cyst according to the new MRIs, but this guy wasn't even looking at the film.
Something is very fishy. We overheard him and another NS talking before the appointment (the NS was 15 minutes late), saying, "Something's wrong here." We couldn't hear further, but we had the feeling someone is ordering these guys to not operate. When the word "conspiracy" keeps coming up, and it's the doctors who keep using it (as in "There' s no conspiracy against you"), it makes you wonder.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:46 am (UTC)Second, you might want to talk to the board which licenses doctors to doctor in your state. Ask them what is supposed to be the minimum priofessional standard for a doctor to maintain, then the expected full standard.
Third, after you get that doctor and tell him he violated the board rules for the state (I know he'll have missed them). Ask him if he wants a complaint sent to the board.
Last advice: from now on, bring a portable tape recorder with you with any doctor meets.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 12:13 pm (UTC)I've been asking him to contact his Neurologist, and quite frankly I don't know why he hasn't yet called the guy (picture of me rolling her eyes). Actually, on second thought, I do; it's that huge thing smooshing his left temporal lobe and his hippocampus. :-(
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 01:06 pm (UTC)My friends Jim and Melissa warned me about him, though. This guy operated on Jim's brain, and when Melissa (Jim's wife) had the "audacity" to ask the doctor how her husband was doing, this doctor tore into her, yelling at her instead of giving her information.
Given this, in some ways he was nicer than I had expected him to be.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 01:01 pm (UTC)Grrrrr...
Outraged on your behalf.
d***
Date: 2003-05-08 01:24 pm (UTC)Warren's right not to go after this particular sphincter-masquerading-as-a-surgeon, if for no other reason than it's not worth the time and energy right now. Getting treatment's more important.
Re: d***
Date: 2003-05-08 02:25 pm (UTC)I wish he would give me PoA. I'm the one person who has nothing to gain by him croaking. OTOH, his major concern was being rendered a "human vegetable," and our viewpoints on euthanasia differ (he'd want to die so he could "go to heaven," I wouldn't because I don't believe in an afterlife).
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 05:25 pm (UTC)He does have to explain it to you. That's part of being a doctor. I have never had a doctor refuse to explain a result, or the meaning of a term, or the reasoning behind a decision. This guy is an ass.
Had I been there, *he* would have needed a doctor.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:57 pm (UTC)Our first task, though, is to get someone to operate on him.
What a dork!
Date: 2003-05-08 07:48 pm (UTC)If it was me, I would have looked the doctor in the eye and said, "You took an oath to help heal people. Know this: If this man dies because you refused to operate on him, then his death will be on your conscience for the rest of your life." I don't like confrontation, but when I feel like I'm backed into a corner, I come out fighting.....and I won't take "no" for an answer.
Re: What a dork!
Date: 2003-05-08 11:58 pm (UTC)Warren is now waffling about filing a complaint (an improvement from this morning). We'll see.
Re: What a dork!
Date: 2003-05-09 08:06 pm (UTC)Any idea how his track record is as a surgeon? For all I know, he may be one of those prima-donnas who is great at what he does, but is an overall jerk in person. That reminds me of a certain well-known SF writer.
Good for Warren! I hope he files a complaint. (I think it's a Catholic trait, or part of the conditioning, to be meek and submissive.)
Re: What a dork!
Date: 2003-05-10 09:56 am (UTC)According to my friends Melissa and Jim, he's a very good surgeon with no discernible bedside manner. When he operated on Jim's brain a few years ago, Melissa (Jim's wife) asked this doctor how Jim's surgery went and how he was doing. Instead of telling her, this surgeon tore into her about how he was "too busy operating" and other such crap to answer her questions, chewing her out for having the audacity to ask about someone's (her husband's) health.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-08 11:35 pm (UTC)*shakes head*
surgeons are known to have a temper, but...
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 12:01 am (UTC)Sorry, no helpful suggestions here other than encouragement to persevere...