We had an IBM flat-screen on test at the office a while back that was 3840x2400 and had a dot pitch of 204dpi. It was the bees knees for looking at NASA hi-res photos. However, any website "optimised" for 800x600 or whatever was likely to be unreadably small...
As for sans-serif fonts, yeah, I'm fairly sure they're designed to cause confusion, but for some inexplicable reason company policy-makers seem to pick them as company-standard with monotonous regularity. Something to do with them being "modern"...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
zaluzianskya and ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
skylark_photos
Re: I'm with you
Date: 2003-02-17 01:12 am (UTC)As for sans-serif fonts, yeah, I'm fairly sure they're designed to cause confusion, but for some inexplicable reason company policy-makers seem to pick them as company-standard with monotonous regularity. Something to do with them being "modern"...